Texas #MUSLIM Kept Slaves, Claiming in Court, It’s “Part of Sharia #Law” #Obama

ByPAMELA GELLER on August 22, 2016

ISLAMIC LAW IN AMERICA SLAVERY IN ISLAM 

61 Comments

    

This is Texas, not Saudi Arabia. But as their numbers continue to rise, so will these horrible crimes. This is sharia law. Obama says, “respect it!”

Every single day, the two women were brought over to al-Homoud’s home, where they were beaten, starved, and worked like slaves for absolutely no pay. The only food they were allowed was from the leftovers he and his wife left, and their only form of a shower was the water hose outside.

When al-Homoud was not “using” his slaves, he “stored” them in a gigantic plastic box he created.

The Quran justifies slavery, and often mentions slaves. Here are some relevant verses:

33:50 – “Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty.”

This verse clearly shows that Muslims believe that taking slaves in war was an Allah-given right. These slaves were considered “booty” or the spoils of war. As the saying goes: to the victors go the spoils.

23:5 –   “… except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them:…”

The passage’s context here (not quoted in full) details how Muslim males are allowed to have sexual relations with their wives and slave girls. Implicit in this is that Muslim males had slave-concubines. 70:30 is basically a repeat of 23:5.

Ibn Sa’d’s “Tabaqat”, gives a clear description of Muhammad having “relations” with at least one of his slave girls. Muhammad had sexual relations with Mariyah, his Coptic slave. Mariyah and her sister, Sirin were slaves given as gifts to Muhammad. Muhammad gave Sirin to Hasan Thabit, the poet. Ibn Sa’d says that Muhammad “liked Mariyah, who was of white complexion, with curly hair and pretty.” [Taken from Ibn Sa’d’s “Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir” (Book of the Major Classes), p151]

Ibn Sa’d also writes that Mariyah bore Muhammad a son named Ibrahim. He died 18 months later. Sa’d writes: “If he had lived, no maternal uncle of his would have remained in bondage”, p164. This shows that there were other Coptic slaves owned by the Muslims.

The Quran also instructs Muslims NOT to force their female slaves into prostitution (24:34), and even allows Muslims to marry slaves if they so desire (4:24), and to free them at times as a penalty for crime or sin (4:92, 5:89, 58:3) and even allows slaves to buy their liberty, if they meet certain of their master’s conditions (24:33). [90:10 ‘freeing of a bondsman’ refers to Muslims ransoming other Muslims who were slaves of non-Muslims.]

The above verses show that taking slaves was ordained by Allah, and that it was permissible for Muslim males to have sex with their female slaves. It also shows that slaves were a valuable commodity to the Muslims, otherwise, Allah would not have imposed the penalty of freeing a slave to make up for a crime.

Two Rich Muslims Just Kept Their Slaves, Claiming It’s “Part Of Sharia Law” By Martin Walsh, Conservative Post, August 18, 2016:

a Texas couple has been found guilty for holding two “servants” hostage and as slaves of Allah. They literally kept two people as slaves to fulfill Allah’s wishes. The situation was so disgusting, a Judge has banished them from the United States forever.

Hassan al-Homoud, 46, and his wife Zainab al-Hosani, 39, pleaded guilty to the crimes of holding a person against their will, and forced labor, otherwise known as SLAVERY. They tried to convince the judge that their actions were acceptable because their Prophet Muhammad, the creator of the religion of Islam, kept slaves of his own. Therefore, any punishment that they received would be Islamophobic.

Not only is that laughable, District Judge Orlando Garcia shut down that ridiculous argument in a heartbeat. The Judge could have sentenced them to prison, but he was afraid that if they exercised good behavior, they would be released early and carry out similar actions again.

The Judge went on a tirade in his ruling that he was well aware of how violent Sharia Law is and because they posed a grave danger to the United States, he banned them from ever coming back into the United States again.

According to the complaint prepared by Homeland Security’s Special Agent Edward Acuna, the problems are believed to have begun when al-Homoud applied for visas for two individuals, one from Indonesia, and the other from Bangladesh.

In the application for the visas, al-Homoud stated the two would be paid as a housekeeper, and a personal servant, and would collect a monthly income of $1573.87. This was a lie as al-Homoud paid his slaves nothing, but it does point out a major flaw in our system.

These applications used by visa seekers, immigrants, and refugees were considered foolproof by Obama and his administration. They claimed that this application would prevent any and all forms of terrorists exploiting our flawed system.

The complaint states that the two women were living in squalor. There were no utensils, barely any food, no toilet paper, no television, no books, no linens, no furniture, and only a couple of blankets and pillows on the floor. They were treated like absolute slaves in he name of Allah.

Every single day the two women were brought over to al-Homoud’s home where they were beaten, starved, and worked like slaves for absolutely no pay. The only food they were allowed was from the leftovers he and his wife left, and their only form of a shower was the water hose outside.

When al-Homoud was not “using” his slaves, he “stored” them in a gigantic plastic box he created. The box was located in a corner of the garage and they were only allowed to come out when they were needed for work.

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2016/08/texas-muslims-kept-slaves-claiming-in-court-its-part-of-sharia-law.html/#sthash.8ZM3biPX.dpuf